Return-to-libc Attack Lab
OverviewThe learning objective of this lab is for students to gain the first-hand experience on an interesting attack on buffer-overflow vulnerability; this attack can bypass an existing protection scheme currently implemented in Linux operating systems. A common way to exploit a buffer-overflow vulnerability is to overflow the buffer with a malicious shellcode, and then cause the vulnerable program to jump to the shellcode that is stored in the stack. To prevent this kind of attacks, some operating systems, such as Fedora Linux, allow system administrators to make stacks non-executable; therefore, jumping to the shellcode will cause the program to fail.
Unfortunately, the above protection scheme is not fool-proof; there exists another type of attacks, the return-to-libc attack, which does not need an executable stack; it does not even use shell code. Instead, it causes the vulnerable program to jump to some existing code, such as the system() function in the libc library, which is already loaded into the memory.
In this lab, students are given a program with a buffer-overflow vulnerability; their task is to develop a return-to-libc attack to exploit the vulnerability and finally to gain the root privilege. In addition to the attacks, students will be guided to walk through several protection schemes that have been implemented in Fedora to counter against the buffer-overflow attacks. Students need to evaluate whether the schemes work or not and explain why.
It should be noted that the outcome of this lab is operating system dependent. Our description and discussion are based on Fedora Linux (Core 4, 5, and 6). If you use different operating systems, different problems and issues might come up.
Lab Description and Tasks (PDF)
Lecture Video: (watch)
File that are Needed
Student FeedbacksTo help us understand how effectively this lab has enhanced students' learning in computer security, we asked students to fill out an anonymous survey right after they finish the lab. We started to conduct the survey since 2007. The survey results depicted in the following are aggregate results over several years.